The 2020's

Works from the years 2020 to 2029

The New Knowledge: Information, Data, and the Remaking of the Global Economy

Haggart, Blayne, Natasha Tusikov. Lantham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2023. Open Access.

From the global geopolitical arena to the smart city, control over knowledge—particularly over data and intellectual property—has become a key battleground for the exercise of economic and political power. For companies and governments alike, control over knowledge—what scholar Susan Strange calls the knowledge structure—has become a goal unto itself. The rising dominance of the knowledge structure is leading to a massive redistribution of power, including from individuals to companies and states. Strong intellectual property rights have concentrated economic benefits in a smaller number of hands, while the ‘internet of things’ is reshaping basic notions of property, ownership, and control. In the scramble to create and control data and intellectual property, governments and companies alike are engaging in ever-more surveillance. The New Knowledge is a guide to and analysis of these changes, and of the emerging phenomenon of the knowledge-driven society. It highlights how the pursuit of the control over knowledge has become its own ideology, with its own set of experts drawn from those with the ability to collect and manipulate digital data. Haggart and Tusikov propose a workable path forward—knowledge decommodification—to ensure that our new knowledge is not treated simply as a commodity to be bought and sold, but as a way to meet the needs of the individuals and communities that create this knowledge in the first place.

Keywords: Knowledge; Structural Power, Power; Theory

Contributor(s): Blayne Haggart and Natasha Tusikov
Keywords: Knowledge, Structural Power, Power, Theory, Strange-Influenced Works, 2020's
Source and Medium: Book

Year of Publication: 2023

'Susan Strange saw the financial crisis coming, Your Majesty': The Case for the LSE's Great Global Political Economist

Dyer, Nat. Real-World Economic Review 98 (2021): 92-111.

This paper makes three arguments. First, that Susan Strange (1923-1998), who founded the field of international political economy in the UK, is one of the principal thinkers who foresaw multiple aspects of the global financial crisis of 2008 and its aftermath. She deserves credit for her prescience but has been overlooked. Second, that Strange's insight was not a series of lucky guesses but emerged from a rich and consistent theoretical and philosophical understanding of 'the political economy of the planet.' Third, that Strange should interest economists today and be thought of as a 'worldly philosopher' – after Heilbroner's term for the first political economists – rather than a figure in a sub-discipline of international relations. With the centenary of her birth in 2023, the time is ripe to reassess this great global political economist of the London School of Economics. It is time to put Strange back into the story we tell about financial globalisation and its discontents.

Keywords: Money and Finance

Contributor(s): Nat Dyer
Keywords: Money and Finance, Strange-Influenced Works, 2020's
Source and Medium: Journal Article

Year of Publication: 2021

Women Thinkers and the Canon of International Thought: Recovery, Rejection, and Reconstitution

Hutchings, Kimberly. Patricia Owens. American Political Science Review 115, no. 2 (2021): 347–59.

Canons of intellectual 'greats' anchor the history and scope of academic disciplines. Within international relations (IR), such a canon emerged in the mid-twentieth century and is almost entirely male. Why are women thinkers absent from IR’s canon? We show that it is not due to a lack of international thought, or that this thought fell outside established IR theories. Rather it is due to the gendered and racialized selection and reception of work that is deemed to be canonical. In contrast, we show what can be gained by reclaiming women’s international thought through analyses of three intellectuals whose work was authoritative and influential in its own time or today. Our findings question several of the basic premises underpinning IR’s existing canon and suggest the need for a new research agenda on women international thinkers as part of a fundamental rethinking of the history and scope of the discipline.

Keywords: Theory; Other

Contributor(s): Kimberley Hutchings and Patricia Owens
Keywords: Theory, Other, Strange-Influenced Works, 2020's
Source and Medium: Journal Article

Year of Publication: 2021

Top